Only a fadograph – karl reisman’s pages

Only a fadograph of a yestern scene
Finnegans Wake by James Joyce 7.15

There are some special Pages:
1. some articles of mine on Finnegans Wake

2. And some things relevant to Leo Reisman
- see the Caricature by Miguel Covarrubias done around 1936.
.
3. A graphic presentation of the pages of
Tom Kittle;s Wake
as published in Jamaica in 1876

4. Some notes and photos for a biographical
sketch – People in Time Lost

Life is a collective fantasy with real landmines bullets and wildflowers ,and trees, real obligations, real pills, real loneliness and sorrows,  real pain, real redwoods, and real dreams.
I am trying to write a blog in which I am able to put the ideas, the personal observations, reactions to media and events, beautiful language, music, performances, and other things that occur to me or that I feel strongly about. -
as well as information I think is special or useful
So I can say these things freely.

“The helmsmen of explorations have discovered how to disturb the peace of others, to profane the guardian spirit of other countries, to mix what prudent nature kept separate, to redouble men’s wants by commerce, to add to the vices of one people those of another, to propagate new follies by force and to set up unheard of lunacies where they did not exist before, and finally to give out the stronger as the wiser. They have shown men new ways, new instruments, new arts by which to tyrannize over and assassinate one another. Thanks to such deeds, a time will come when other peoples, having learned from the injuries they have suffered, will know how and will be able/ to return even worse fruits of such perniciousness/.”                       Giordano Bruno 1584

Welcome comments from those interested in what they read

In the name of the former and of the latter and of their holocaust. Allmen.
Finnegans Wake by James Joyce 419.10

How can one need “help” with a poem?

How can one need “help” with a poem?
What are they doing to #literature in our #schools?
They make it unfriendly and “difficult”.

A poem is a bunch of words in your mouth.
It is possibility and imagination and life.

 

 

ON READING METHOD IN FINNEGANS WAKE by Orlando Mezzabotta

 

ON READING METHOD IN FINNEGANS WAKE by Orlando Mezzabotta  ormez@libero.it ormez@libero.it via lists.colorado.edu

Susan,
first of all thank you for “fol de rol”, a term
which I didn’t know and which sounds indeed Joycian.

But now let’s talk of  “reading method”, a field I am
particularly interested in. When you say :

“the sucking staff near the jewels seems obvious”

I infer (pardon me if I am delirious) that you
refer to oral sex (a metaphorical lollipop):
we all know what male “jewels” are!Now, if I got you wrong, skip the rest. If not,
some remarks seem necessary.

FW 235.32-236.2 is a description of Lady Marmela,
each element related to her figure and appearance,
in a sort of Archimboldian portrait.
So we have :

1 – switch (a false tress) / marchpane
2 – necklace / almonds
3 – sunday dress / poirette
4 – bracelets / honey
5 – hose / cochineal (scarlet) / b.t.w: Italian “coccinella” (ladybird)
6 – shoes (dancings) / caramel

7 – suckingstaff / mint

Now, since the first 6 elements are certainly clothes
and accessories (jewels), I infer, following a logical chain
(and Joyce is “pure logic”, no matter how masked),
that “suckingstaff” has to be related to clothes.
That is why I suggested a possible corset, which gives
the female body such a “charmeuse” shape. And,
no matter how “sucking”:

FW 236.1 You mustn’t miss it or you’ll be sorry.

Resuming, in shot types (236.1-2):

a – clothes -> full shot
b – jewels  -> mid shot / cut in
c – fan     -> medium close up
d – cigarette -> extreme close up

Now, of course each element has a lot of side meanings,
but the “dominant” image is “apparel”, so each element,
according to my reading method, must be closely related to it,
lest it lose its internal logic.
Certainly you might say that “cynarette” points to “suckingstaff”,
so the image is that of an elegantly dressed young lady
smoking a cigarette. But I am still of the opinion that the first
group [1-7] must have first an “apparel” consistency.

At any rate thank you for your comment. Different opinions
are always useful to check what I may take too much for granted

or what may give vent to fol-de-rol flights. :) )

orlando

Orlando Mezzabotta’s reading of lines 240.30–35

ormez@libero.it ormez@libero.it via lists.colorado.edu
5:15 AM (4 hours ago)

Reply
to fwread

Well Karl,
when I said that the passage does not seem so enigmatic
I didn’t mean that it is lined with roses, or, if it is,
one must take care of thorns.
At any rate I think the general idea of the paragraph starting
from 240.05 is clear enough. It describes Shem’s public forswearing
of his past and sinful life, his “Examen of conscience”.
In fact it is the morphing of Shem into his opposite “Shaunian” aspect.
And if we jump to the passage under examination we may detect a lot
of more or less overt allusions to that. Let’s give it a try:

240.30:  He, A. A., in peachskin shantungs, possible, sooth to say,
240.31:  notwithstanding far former guiles and he gaining fish consider-240.32:  able, by saving grace after avalunch, to look most prophitable     240.33:  out of smily skibluh eye. He repeat of him as pious alios cos he 240.34:  ast for shave and haircut people said he’d shape of hegoat where
240.35:  he just was sheep of herrgott with his tile togged. Top.

“He,A.A.” That’s a sardonic start, a sort of onomatopeic bray (hee-haw),
and an act of obedience (Aye,Aye [sir!]) made by Augustine Aloysius
(eye-eye : Italian ahi-ahi: ouch!) poor/pair eyed Joyce.
He changes his rude complexion into a delicate (fruitish: peach)
and silky one (shantung); his Chinese pidgin (peachskin) into an orthodox
Shaunian tongue (Shaun tung : tung, from Old English tung, tunge :
“tongue, language”).
The “twin” image is enhanced by the fact that the original and precious
“shantung”, shantung silk, or duppioni silk, is made of the duppion silk
yarn, that is from the cocoon of two silk worms that have nested together.
Although hard to believe, almost non plausible, this Shem-Shaunian’s new look is indeed possible (in sooth) [sooth: hinting vaguely at Italian "seta" : silk],
no matter how treacherous and cunning his past actions (former guiles)
have been.
And his physique has changed as well. He has put on some weight (fish / flesh) [like our well known stately and plump Buck Mulligan] since – after his plentiful meals (avalanche -> lunch — French “avaler” : to swallow) – he has learned not to dissipate his fat  (grace -> French “gras”,  Italian “grasso” : fat), so that his aspect  is that of a farsighted wise man (prophet), full of grace/gras, content of himself, with smiling and dear (Russian : milyi)
blue, celestial (sky oriented) eyes who gives profitable directions
to “fhish” people.  (His fish of wisdom.)
It’s the “kiblah” (the direction of the Kaaba, in Mecca, toward which Muslims face when praying), the straight road to follow, which is the opposite of the old (sinful) road: “qiblah” is Arabic “that which is placed opposite”;  and  Arabic “qabala” as well (to be opposite);     but Hebrew “qabbalah” too, with its esoteric teaching (FW).
But “gaining fish” and “saving grace” have Christian hints as well and point directly to the The  First Feeding Miracle, the only miracle
(apart from the resurrection) which is present in all four canonical Gospels (Matthew 14:13-21, Mark 6:31-44, Luke 9:10-17 and John 6:5-15.)
The new Shem has learned how to fish (hook people), how to feed them with his (magical) words and charm them with his “blue-sky-directed looks”
which turn five loaves of bread and two fish [again a "twin" image : Pisces]
into an avalanche of food  (have a lunch),                                                            the rest of which, the surplus (profit), he does not waste  or throw away,  but “saves” graciously and thankfully (saying grace).  That is indeed a miracle if compared  with the dissolute intemperance and wastefulness of the old Shem. He outlived (save) through grace the “avalanche” of sins.
The old Shem who keeps saying that he is another man (alios -> alius,
Latin : other), a pious one, like the pious Aeneas,
[but a Triestine could read it as "pajasso" (clown) [pah-yah-soh],
so a “pajas+soul” (clownish soul) and a “pajas+helios” (clownish sun)];
a priestly one  (piou-s-alios : Latin salios [acc. plural];                                 salius [singular]: “priest of Mars”);  so a warring priest, member of the Church Militant, like a pious Aenes  founder of a new Rome; a pagan Jebusite turned into a Jesuit;   one who must be measured with different meters and ratios: cos [trigonometry] cosine against the “sinful” sin);
“ast” (alternating series test) a method used to prove  that infinite series
of terms converge (converge -> conversion), discovered by Gottfried Leibniz.
That same Leibniz who surmised that there are indefinitely many substances individually ‘programmed’ to act in a predetermined way,  each program being coordinated with all the others. (WP).
[Leibnitz -> Monad : Italian "mònade"; but Triestine "monàde" : bullshit]
And that is exactly Shem’s condition, Shem who has been appointed by
the special verb (herrgott : argot [French: slang] ) of Almighty God
(Herr Gott)  to be a scapegoat (shape hegoat),
“With his broad and hairy face, to Ireland a disgrace” (II,2,260),
under the shape (togged / togued) of a devil (Glugg), apparently sure of
himself (tail up), but actually tugged and stoned, lapidated (tile).
And watch out: “tail up” means “bottom exposed”.
As our Russian General knows!

 

Afghanistan

Dear Mr President,
If Afghanistan was wet I could call it a quagmire.
Now I don’t know what to call it.
Your outgoing Secretary of Defense was just on TV sounding  the endless logic of the cold war. We elected you to end that atmosphere, not just the war.
But apparently it will have no end. The goals are impossible – there is not even a practical legitimate government in that divided place.
And our very preseence is a major cause of the problem.
We, most Americans, are incapabble of administering “alien” peoples. I know. I have seen Americans overseas in 30 or more different contexts. Everything they feel and believe makes them put their foot in it over and over again – as I have seen for the last 50 of my 80 years.
We have seen the enemy and she is us.
Get us out of there,
Take the losses. We cannot plan or fix it.

Frank Lloyd Wright

The trouble is that I raised myself with the illusion that life should be as well (or narrowly) ordered as a Frank Lloyd Wright house.

Letter from Cairns

Comment from Cairns: Let’s face it – you Americans like killing. You like to watch films (that you call ‘movies’) about killing – you call them blockbusters, or crime stories, or thrillers, or murder mysteries, or horrors; you like to play computer games in which you kill characters; you like to read stories about killing; and you like to kill non-human animals for fun, to eat their corpses. Some of you even like to kill other humans, either in a uniform or outside the law, in which latter case you will probably be killed in turn by lethal injection or electrocution if you are caught and convicted. • For almost half a millennium, the USA has been a killing field. You dispossessed by killing the original owners of the sub-divisions where you now build your McHomes. You terrorised your imported and bred African slaves by killing them when they got uppity. You go around the world killing the Vietnamese, the Cambodians, the Iraqis, the Afghanis and anyone else whom you think you have the God Given right to kill. Every year, you commemorate on Independence Day your unlawful rebellion against the English monarch whose prime concern was to stop you killing even more Native Americans as your greed for land pushed you ever further west. • You Americans are good at killing. It’s probably the one and only thing indeed that you do really, really well – better than anyone else on earth. You are a sick country of sick people whose high rates of murder, cruelty and destruction are a mirror into your souls.
Comment
One massacre does not define a people. Look at the case in Norway. It may show that the Norwegians are slightly more tense about their beliefs and judgements than Danes, but it does not show them to be a murderous people.
  It is the false bullying masculinity image in the U.S. and the constant killling,
domestically and overseas that this supports that is the problem the letter
from Cairns is pointing to.

how many kids are willing to kill — even for free

Dear Gregory Castle – clearly you are not acting out book film or video game fantasies. But some people – too many – are. Read descriptions of the thousands of idiotic gun incidents that don’t happen to kill people, or the cultures of murder in which so many try to live their lives. As the Gang boss in Guayquil said: “You wouldn’t believe how many kids are willing to kill — even for free”